Human review is required.
Tools may assist with organization, language and consistency, but a report is not delivered without human review. Birth details, chart notes, scope, wording and the focused question are checked before the final PDF is sent.
Claims keep their evidence class.
Public content separates service facts, project observations, interpretations, hypotheses and unknowns. DAYSTEM does not turn a practitioner anecdote, a chart interpretation or the absence of data into a universal fact.
Uncertainty stays visible.
A reading can describe patterns and possible timing themes; it cannot establish a guaranteed future event. Strong outcome claims, invented credentials, fabricated testimonials and unsupported statistics are not acceptable DAYSTEM copy.
Private information stays private.
Clients should provide birth details and personal context only through the private intake after checkout. They should not post them in public comments, URLs or open social messages. Public examples must be anonymized and must not expose a client’s precise personal information.
Corrections have an owner.
If a public DAYSTEM page contains an inaccurate service fact, unclear limitation or attribution problem, contact tejetubhe@hotmail.com. Material corrections are reviewed by Francis Liu and updated at the source page.